The state of the AI economy: why early adopters are pulling ahead faster

qw
vc
mshm
Trending AI Topics
September 29, 2026
Cinematic visualization of a growth curve splitting into a glowing, continuing path and a dim, stalling path, symbolizing early AI adopters versus laggards.

Early AI adopters are pulling ahead of their competitors, recent research shows: the AI economy is growing three times faster than previous technology waves, and companies that wait now fall further behind by the day. Falling token prices don't make AI less urgent, they make the lead of early adopters even bigger.

Summary

 

  • The AI economy already generates $110 billion in annual revenue and is growing three times faster than previous technology waves.
  • Every 10 percent drop in token price leads to 12 to 18 percent more token usage: demand keeps pace with the price.
  • Early AI adopters are already building a measurable lead, just as they did with the internet and mobile.
  • Half of CEOs say their job depends on getting AI execution right.
  • Waiting for a lower price or a better model costs more than taking a first step today.

 

Early AI adopters are pulling ahead of their competitors, recent research shows: the AI economy is growing three times faster than previous technology waves, and companies that wait now fall further behind by the day. Falling token prices don't make AI less urgent, they make the lead of early adopters even bigger.

 

 

What the numbers show: the AI economy is growing three times faster than previous waves

 

Recent research from Exponential View (Azhar Khan, June 25, 2026) lays out the numbers: the AI economy generated $110 billion in revenue over the past twelve months, at an annual run rate now pointing toward $175 billion. That's three times faster than the internet and mobile waves at the same point in their development.

 

McKinsey sees the same acceleration: 88 percent of companies now use AI in at least one business function, up from 78 percent a year earlier. The share scaling AI agents across one or more functions rose from 27 to 40 percent.

 

Chart from the research
Source: Exponential View, The State of the AI Economy, June 2026.

 

These growth figures aren't an abstract, far-off story. They explain why companies leading today are making their lead harder to close with every passing month.

 

For a Dutch SME, that pace often feels abstract until you translate it to your own sector. An accounting firm now using AI to prepare tax filings, a construction company that automatically drafts quotes, a staffing agency matching candidates faster: these are all examples of the same shift Exponential View measures at a macro level. The numbers are global, the effect is local and directly felt in the boardroom.

 

 

Why falling token prices fuel demand instead of slowing it down

 

A common argument is: wait until AI gets cheaper. But Exponential View shows that a 10 percent drop in token price actually leads to 12 to 18 percent more token usage. Total AI spend rises, even as the price per unit falls.

 

That pattern is now measurable between companies. According to Semafor, the most active 10 percent of AI users consumed 8.3 times as many tokens per user in June as companies in the middle of the pack, up from 2.6 times in January. That gap is widening fast.

 

Stat card: a 10 percent drop in token price leads to 12 to 18 percent more token usage.
Every 10% drop in token price: 12-18% more usage (source: Exponential View, 2026).

 

A lower price is not a reason to wait: it's the signal that the lead of early adopters is growing. Companies that put a clear AI strategy in place now benefit directly from every price drop, instead of chasing it after the fact.

 

 

The levels of AI use: from chatting to agents that do the work

 

Not all AI use is equal. There's a clear difference between an AI agent that completes a task independently, an automated workflow that handles a fixed process, and a chatbot that only answers once someone asks a question. According to Gartner, 40 percent of enterprise applications will feature a task-specific AI agent this year, up from under 5 percent last year.

 

Most SMEs are still at the chat level: employees ask a chatbot one-off questions, with the system disconnected from the rest of the organization. That's a fine starting point, but it's not the same as letting AI work across the entire organization, where systems feed each other and an agent takes steps on its own.

 

Isometric illustration of three systems: a chatbot, an automated workflow, and an independent AI agent.
From chatbot to workflow to independent AI agent.

 

The gap in AI maturity between companies that take this seriously and companies that stop at a loose subscription grows wider every month. A standalone AI subscription is not an AI strategy.

 

Take a simple example: a chatbot that helps an employee draft an email saves a few minutes each time. A workflow that automatically recognizes, checks, and readies incoming invoices for approval saves hours per week. An agent that runs the check itself, spots exceptions, and only brings in a human when it's unsure shifts an entire process from manual to supervised-automatic. That's the real difference between levels, not the tool you use but how much of the process actually runs without intervention.

 

 

Why "we're already doing something with AI" often isn't enough

 

Many leadership teams think they're covered because everyone has an AI subscription. Research from BCG tells a different story: companies that have embedded AI strategically are over four times more likely to capture a measurable profit impact from it, compared to companies stuck in isolated pilots. Sixty percent of all companies still report little to no value from their AI efforts.

 

The difference isn't the tool, it's the approach. Companies leading in AI adoption tie AI to a specific process with an owner and a measurable target. Companies falling behind let AI exist alongside the work instead of inside it.

 

That's exactly why "we're already doing something with AI" is often a reassurance, not a strategy. Anyone without an answer to which process AI makes faster, cheaper, or better today isn't running an AI strategy yet: they're running a loose experiment.

 

Early adopters ask themselves three questions before starting a new AI project: which process costs the most time right now, who owns that process, and how will we measure in three months whether it's improved. Companies that fall behind skip those questions and start with the tool instead of the problem. That difference in sequence ultimately decides whether an AI project becomes a lasting part of the organization or a forgotten trial balloon.

 

 

What waiting really costs you

 

The difference between starting now and starting a year from now is clearest side by side. Below is a comparison, based on the token price, usage and profit-impact figures from Exponential View, Semafor and BCG.

 

Starting an AI strategy now

 

  • Benefits directly from every drop in token price, instead of catching up to it later
  • Builds measurable process improvement within the current fiscal year

 

Waiting until AI is "more mature" or cheaper

 

  • Runs into a growing token gap: leaders already consume more than eight times as much per user
  • Starts only once early adopters have already built a structural cost advantage

 

Waiting feels safe, but it's the more expensive choice. The same pattern played out with the internet and mobile: whoever got in early kept that lead for years.

 

 

How to take a first, responsible step today

 

 

Minimal line illustration of a path with a first, highlighted step.
A first AI step: small, measurable, quick to start.

 

A responsible first step doesn't start with a big budget, but with a sharp choice: which process costs the most time right now, and where does automation deliver results fastest. Say two comparable companies in the same sector face that choice: one picks a small, measurable pilot project around that one process, the other waits "until things are quieter." Only the first company gathers data to build on within a few months.

 

That's exactly what an AI pilot project is for: start small, learn fast, and only then scale to more processes. No big promise upfront, just a concrete starting point.

 

A responsible first step has three traits: a process with a clear owner, a measurable target you can set today, and a timeline of weeks, not quarters. Without those three traits, a pilot project turns into a loose experiment that stalls after a few months, exactly the pattern that trips up companies without an AI strategy most often.

 

The companies with the lead two years from now are the companies that already started this quarter.

 

 

Frequently asked questions

 

What exactly is the AI economy and how fast is it growing?

 

The AI economy is the sum of all revenue companies generate from AI products and services. According to Exponential View, it generated $110 billion over the past twelve months, at an annual run rate heading toward $175 billion, three times faster than the internet and mobile waves at the same point.

 

Why are AI tokens getting cheaper, and what does that mean for my business?

 

Tokens are the unit AI models are billed in, and that price is falling thanks to faster, more efficient models. That doesn't make AI less relevant: every 10 percent price drop leads to 12 to 18 percent more usage, so total spend actually rises.

 

Is it smart to wait with AI until the technology is more mature?

 

No. Companies already active today are building a lead that gets harder to close as time passes. Waiting means starting at the point when early adopters have already built a structural cost advantage.

 

What's the difference between "doing something with AI" and real early adoption?

 

A standalone AI subscription is not a strategy. Early adoption means tying AI to a specific process, with an owner and a measurable target, so you can see whether it works and where you scale.

 

How much of a lead have early AI adopters already built?

 

According to Semafor, the most active 10 percent of users consumed 8.3 times as many tokens per user in June as companies in the middle of the pack, up from 2.6 times in January. That gap is widening fast.

 

What risks do companies face if they still do nothing with AI?

 

The biggest risk isn't that AI wouldn't work, but that competitors will have already built the process, the knowledge, and the cost advantages by the time a company starts. That gap is harder to close than the first step itself.

 

As an SME leadership team, how do I take a first, responsible AI step?

 

Start with a small, measurable pilot project around the process that currently costs the most time. The Agentic Group helps with an AI Strategy & Roadmap, so that first step fits directly into a bigger plan.

 

 

Want to accelerate AI adoption in your organization?

 

At The Agentic Group, we guide Dutch SMEs through exactly this first step every day. Waiting for a lower price or a better model costs you more than it saves. With a clear AI strategy you take the first step today, instead of handing competitors a lead. Want to see what that looks like in practice first? Read how AI can work across your entire organization.

 

View AI Strategy & Roadmap

 

Read more articles

From insight to impact.
We translate AI oportunities into practical profit for your business.
z
z
z
z
i
i
z
z